Case study · Consumer, Food & Retail
A private-label defence strategy that recovered 4 share points inside two years.
An FMCG brand losing shelf position to retailer private label needed a category-level view on where to defend, where to concede, and where to reinvest.
-
The client had lost 3.8 share points across three categories in 18 months, all to retailer private label. The brand team wanted to fight everywhere; the CFO wanted to concede in low-margin lines. Nobody had a category-level model to arbitrate.
-
A senior lead built a category-level defensibility framework based on four axes: gross margin, private-label price gap, brand loyalty index, and innovation-response cost. Two analysts scored 34 SKUs across the framework. A primary consumer study (n=1,200) validated the loyalty scores. We identified 9 SKUs to defend hard, 12 to concede, and 13 to reposition with a premium tier.
-
A defensibility scorecard for each SKU, an 18-month reinvestment sequencing plan, a competitive war-game deck for the sales team, and a follow-on innovation brief for the R&D pipeline.
-
The client recovered 4.1 share points across the defended lines within 24 months. The conceded lines were quietly consolidated with two SKU deletions and a co-brand deal on a third. R&D shipped two premium-tier extensions inside 12 months, both of which now sit in the top-15 of the category.
Client identity is anonymised in this write-up. On-record versions are available on request where the client has given explicit consent — reach the desk for named references.
Similar decision on your table?
Let's scope the research that supports it.
A 30-minute scoping call is free. We'll tell you honestly whether an existing report answers your question, or whether it warrants a custom engagement like this one.